One of the first strategic questions on a new Florida lawsuit is whether it belongs in federal court. Removal is available on short notice or not at all, and the answer changes the schedule, the treatment of expert testimony, the summary judgment posture, and often the settlement dynamics of the case. For corporate and insurer defendants, that decision is worth making deliberately in the first days of an engagement.
Topkin Law litigates in the United States District Courts for the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida and handles matters before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The firm defends removed diversity actions, litigates commercial and federal-question matters, and appears as Florida counsel for national firms and institutional clients whose cases are pending here.
We evaluate diversity and other grounds for removal at intake, act within the statutory window, and defend against remand, including where a non-diverse defendant appears to have been joined to defeat federal jurisdiction. When the state forum is the better place for a client, we say so rather than removing out of habit.
Premises, product, transportation, and catastrophic injury cases increasingly proceed federally. We defend them with the tools the forum rewards, including disciplined Rule 26 disclosures, Rule 56 practice built on a developed record, and Daubert challenges to plaintiff experts filed on the schedule the court sets rather than the one the parties would prefer.
Motions to dismiss, judgment on the pleadings, summary judgment, Daubert motions, and motions in limine. Each is briefed for the judge assigned and the record developed, not adapted from a form file.
The firm defends putative class actions in federal court and serves as Florida counsel in multidistrict and coordinated proceedings. Those practices are described on the Class Actions and Complex and Multi-District Litigation pages.
National firms and institutional clients retain the firm to handle Florida federal matters managed from outside the state. We take the appearances, depositions, hearings, and local procedural work, integrate with the lead team’s strategy, and report in whatever format the program uses. Coordinating counsel should never learn about a development in their Florida case after the fact.
Error is preserved at the trial level with appellate review in mind, and the firm handles Eleventh Circuit proceedings where the engagement calls for it.
Insurers, third-party administrators, self-insured companies, retailers, manufacturers and distributors, transportation companies, and healthcare businesses, along with the national defense firms and institutional clients who retain the firm as Florida counsel.
Our clients include physician practices across specialties, PIP clinics, surgery centers, diagnostic providers, and the management companies that support them. The firm represents providers in clawback and recoupment matters arising from the full range of carriers operating in Florida, including major P&C carriers such as Allstate, State Farm, Progressive, GEICO, USAA, Liberty Mutual, and Travelers, and commercial health and managed care payers such as UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, Cigna, Humana, and Florida Blue. The firm also handles matters involving Medicare administrative contractors, Medicare Advantage plans, Medicaid managed care organizations, and AHCA.
The forum analysis happens immediately, because the removal window closes quickly and the decision shapes everything downstream. Clients get a recommendation on the facts of their case rather than a default preference.
Once the case is in federal court, it is run the way that court expects. Deadlines are treated as firm, disclosures are complete, and the written record is built with care, because federal judges decide most of these cases on paper.
